<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sorts 1 Petabyte in 6 Hours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewknight.com.au/2008/12/google-sorts-1-petabyte-in-6-hours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewknight.com.au/2008/12/google-sorts-1-petabyte-in-6-hours/</link>
	<description>Australian Web Hosting, Search Engine Optimisation &#38; Credit Cards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 06:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewknight.com.au/2008/12/google-sorts-1-petabyte-in-6-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewknight.com.au/?p=545#comment-192</guid>
		<description>That really is a lot of data.

I don&#039;t think physical technology is the only thing that is progressing; our understanding of data, and how it is applied, is also progressing and is what drives innovations that allows a company like Google to process a MONUMENTAL quantity of data into a state that allows it to be utilised in ways that really matter - it&#039;s possible to waste an enormous amount of resources crunching data and make it only 2% more useful, but what&#039;s even better is knowing exactly what to do with that data, using half the resources and making it a hundred times more useful.

I think you&#039;re on the money using &quot;hardware&quot; and &quot;knowledge&quot; in the same sentence.... any idiot can throw a million dollars worth of hardware at a problem and then rejoice when the speed increases, but true genius will try to find a way to increase the efficiency of such a process without touching the infrastructure.... and then dance all over the arrogant sods head when they get an extra hundred-fold increase using the same million dollars worth of tech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really is a lot of data.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think physical technology is the only thing that is progressing; our understanding of data, and how it is applied, is also progressing and is what drives innovations that allows a company like Google to process a MONUMENTAL quantity of data into a state that allows it to be utilised in ways that really matter &#8211; it&#8217;s possible to waste an enormous amount of resources crunching data and make it only 2% more useful, but what&#8217;s even better is knowing exactly what to do with that data, using half the resources and making it a hundred times more useful.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re on the money using &#8220;hardware&#8221; and &#8220;knowledge&#8221; in the same sentence&#8230;. any idiot can throw a million dollars worth of hardware at a problem and then rejoice when the speed increases, but true genius will try to find a way to increase the efficiency of such a process without touching the infrastructure&#8230;. and then dance all over the arrogant sods head when they get an extra hundred-fold increase using the same million dollars worth of tech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
